Google & China: Some are predicting that Google will leave China (Reuters article) in a few weeks rather than continue government-required although apparently limited filtering of certain news (see today’s WSJ). The war of words has picked up by Chinese government officials, usually a precursor to government action.
I’m not sure what’s all involved here. What I am sure of is that it all feels like backward movement. Google is confronted with a non-option … limited censorship. Imagine Google being expected (or required) to be an active participant in limiting the free-flow of information.
In short, Google is being asked by the Chinese government to turn back the clock … to do what can’t be done. They are being asked to limit news-sharing after Chinese citizens have tasted a freer flow of news. This is going to become very interesting if, indeed, Google leaves China and Chinese people react.
Twitter & the Telegraph: A fascinating discussion over the weekend with Gary Kebbel, director of the Knight Foundation Journalism Program at a recent IPREX Meeting. Interestingly, Kebbel, a former newspaper editor, shared that he will be leaving his Knight post to become the new dean of Journalism at the University of Nebraska.
Also in the discussion was Mike Griffin, the new VP of Communications (Public Affairs) for Walt Disney World, also the former managing editor of the Orlando Sentinel.
In a free-ranging dinner conversation about the challenges facing journalism today, mostly brought about by technology advancement and advent of online citizen journalism, these two hard-core journalists were lamenting the dimunition of good, crisp, journalistic writing and the lack of discipline apparent today in capturing the lead and reporting from there.
Kebbel interestingly added that tight, focused, journalistic writing was inspired by the advent of the telegraph and the need to get news from the “wild West” back to the eastcoast establishment. Telegraph outlets were very limited and reporters stood in line to dictate to fast-fingered telegraph operators. Out of fairness, reporters were limited to one paragraph of dictation – about 140 characters or so – and then they had to move to the back of the line. They learned to write their lead and fill in more later.
Kebbel, Griffin and others in the discussion all agreed that Twitter was forcing many to tighten-up and write right, at least from a journalistic perspective.
Interesting, isn’t it? China seeks to control the news flow and Twitter is making the world better at getting to the (news) point!
Post by Nick Vehr (3.14.10)